In or Out?

Does the world appear inside or outside the mind?

If the world appears outside the mind, then it would make sense to fix the world in order to fix the mind.

If the world appears inside the mind, then it wouldn’t make sense to fix the world in order to fix the mind.

So, which is it?

Indeed, we live in a culture founded on the premise that the world does appear and exist outside the mind. And thus, our culture keeps trying to fix, control, stockpile, or in some cases rid ourselves of the contents and circumstances of the world in order to fix the mind.

But how are we doing?

Are we living in love and compassion? Are we living in peace of mind?

Not exactly.

So, could it be that our culture’s founding premise is backward?

Could it be that—rather than continuing to search for new methods, activities, strategies, rules, relationships, boundaries, or substances in order to find peace of mind—we should ask ourselves, as I did earlier, if anyone has ever experienced a world, or anything, outside of the mind?

Fact is: No one can answer yes to this question.

And if nothing’s ever been found outside of or separate from the mind, wouldn’t this mean that everything—the entire world of objects, others, and events—appears inside the mind and is made of mind?

Could this be the simple reason that by innocently but fruitlessly trying to fix the circumstances of the world, we keep spinning our wheels; moving further and further away from love, compassion, and peace?

After all, in the history of mankind we’ve tried everything—except considering that the world just might be made of mind, not matter.

So, why not consider it?

Rather than desperately seeking solutions, let’s explore and understand what problems are made of, what the world is made of, and most important, what we are made of. Let’s consider the possibility that we’re trying to fix what isn’t there as we know it. And then, let’s consider the implications of this possibility.

For starters, here’s an interesting implication:

If we are made of mind—i.e., infinite and eternal Consciousness itself—then we don’t need to be fixed.

Are you in or out?

Garret

The self Cannot Know God

You’re trying so hard, but . . .

The self cannot know Love.

The self cannot know Peace.

The self cannot know God.

These are the interchangeable names we give to what’s real; names synonymous with Source.

And while it’s noble to try, the self cannot access or know its Source. The self cannot experience what’s real because any knowing from the perspective of the self is an imagined knowing. 

In other words, you (the self) are merely the image or agency that God uses to “know” what is not real; to know something—objects, selves, a world—other than itself. God doesn’t need you to know itself. God knows itself by itself as itself. 

So, stop trying so darn hard.

You cannot know—let alone seek your way to—Love, Peace, or God. A personal relationship with the impersonal is simply not possible. You’re here at the will of God for the exact opposite “reason.”

It is through you that God knows an illusory world of form. 

Garret

No Matter the Ego, Head for Home

Throughout history, and in all fields, there’s been a select few who have challenged current models. You know some of the names: Jesus, Copernicus, Gandhi, King. In the face of vast backlash, these innovators or change agents have helped strip away our culturally conditioned beliefs.

What you might not know is that the work you read about here each week—which points away from the belief that who you truly are is a separate self, person, or ego, and toward the intimacy or indivisible nature of all experience—is also the subject of backlash. Why? Because the ego, in order to maintain its apparent existence, must resist. It must fortify its “humanness.” It will accuse the one who points toward true nature, the change agent, of not living in the real world. It will insist that he or she is woo-woo, impractical, or divisive. It might even poke fun and belittle.

But here’s the thing: There’s nothing more impractical and divisive, let alone unproven, than the belief that who you are shares the limits and destiny of the body and mind. In fact, understanding that the true Self is infinite and eternal, that it does not lack—that who you are is Freedom, Love, or God’s Being itself—is what allows life to be authentically lived in the so-called “real” or objective world. In other words, a productive physical life is contingent on first understanding that true nature is anything but physical.

At a time or two, you’ve had the inkling that there’s more to a body and mind, more to life, more to the appearance of separation than meets the eye. So, explore this inkling with all your heart. Regardless of ego, even when it mocks or kicks back with vengeance, keep going. If you need support, look to fellow explorers on this direct or pathless path.

To no avail, the world has turned outward to objects and others, insisted that answers are found in an illusory human experience, for long enough.

It’s your sacred calling to set a resolute example and, no matter what, courageously head for Home.

Thank you for reading,

Garret

Stay With Me

In a self-help world of experts, methods, and techniques, here’s a brief reminder: Pushing discomfort, anxiety, or fear away; trying to be more upbeat or positive; coping or managing thoughts and feelings—serves but one purpose. It reinforces the culturally conditioned belief that certain thoughts and feelings are unbearable. In other words, when you attempt to distract yourself from certain thoughts and feelings, without realizing it, you are perpetuating them.

Rather, before you seek or resist, simply pause. Draw close to thoughts and feelings. Be with them.

You’ll find that, in your actual experience, nothing is unbearable. Who you are is completely open. Who you are is resilience, freedom and peace, itself

Inward and up,

Garret

 

Hooked on a Feeling

In many self-help and spiritual circles, including this community, the advice, “Look for and find a good feeling” is common. And for obvious reasons. What person doesn’t covet a so-called "good" or "beautiful" feeling? One of relief, satisfaction, or comfort. And while the objective search for a good feeling is logical, when it comes to getting to the root or nature of experience, when it comes to an exploration of who you are, when it comes to the eradication of belief, when it comes to long-term peace, please consider that a good feeling is not the place to look.

Here's why:

Feelings have an objective quality to them. Like all objects, they are known. They are transient. They are insecure. They come and they go. Thus, a good feeling provides no lasting guidance. In fact, looking for and finding a good feeling—absent of an experiential understanding of true nature—is at the heart of addiction. It provides glimpses of respite, only to be veiled by insecurity once more.

On the other hand, the realization that who you are does not share the limits or destiny of the body, the realization that you are Consciousness itself, is neutral. It arrives with no bells, no whistles, no fanfare. Actually, since Consciousness is found in the absence of a separate self, ego, or body, it’s also found in the absence of feeling. With no sense of self, there are no feelings at all.

Remember: Feelings are an impermanent thrill ride. Consciousness, however, remains lovingly indifferent, steadily at peace, and eternally present.

Seek and get hooked on a good feeling—still seem like a good idea?

How about: Explore who you are. Find what does not come and go; what has never left your side.

Get hooked on that.

Garret

In ‘19, Perhaps It’s Worth a Look

About five years back, a player/client asked me: “G, how exactly do I experience my thinking as you say I do? Can you explain how that works in the body and mind?”

My answer:

I didn’t have one.

The question had me pause. While I had been taught and believed it to be true, I couldn’t actually explain how a body-mind experiences thought (or itself, an object, a circumstance, the world, or anything for that matter).

In fact, no one has ever uncovered how a body-mind can know or experience. And this includes neuroscientists.

And yet, of this I’m sure:

I am the knower. I am the one who experiences.

So, perhaps—if a body-mind is not capable of experiencing, yet I am the one who experiences—who I am is not a body-mind.

Perhaps in ’19, “Who I am” is worth a genuine look.

Happy New Year, everyone. Here’s to a courageous journey ahead. A journey into the very heart of experience.

Garret

I Am the One Who. . .

"I am the one who chooses." "I am the one who forgives.”

“I am the one who’s grateful."

"I am the one who accepts."

"I am the one who suffers."

"I am the one who thinks."

"I am the one who feels."

"I am the one who’s resilient."

“I am the one who loves.”

"I am the one who’s aware."

Yet, when I try to find the part of me, the part (or parts) of my body, that has the power to do any of the above—I can’t.

In fact, nobody can or ever has.

That’s because I am not a body.

I am the one who knows; the one who experiences a body and all other things.

Who am I?

I am = God’s infinite Being,

I am = Awareness or Consciousness itself.

I am = me, you, us.

This holiday season, and beyond, let’s keep exploring who we are—the sacred answer to peace.

Love, Garret

Thoughts, Principles, and Other Objects

If you’re reading this post, odds are that you have a strong sense that digging into the past, the future, personal situations, relationships, possessions, environments, rituals, or techniques—the objective world—is a step away from Source. A step away from the true Self. A step away from answers. A step away from peace, happiness, and love. And that is wonderful.

But could you be overlooking a big piece to the puzzle?

Namely, that the cognitive approach of plunging into thoughts (feelings and mindset, too) as an alternative is also a step away from Source. That thoughts are also objects. Like other objects, thoughts appear and disappear; they have an objective or empirical quality to them; they are known.

Sure, you can claim (as I used to) that you’re talking about the principle of thought, not personal thought. But what’s the difference? Referring to thought as a principle is the very act of objectifying thought. And clearly, pointing toward objects is the opposite of pointing toward Source.

Why, you might ask, do I bring up this topic?

Simple. When I realized where my own confusion around this work was coming from (i.e., stepping away from who I am in an attempt to find who I am), my life and my work changed on a dime.

See if your experience matches mine.

The ego seeks answers in thoughts, principles, and other objects.

The true Self, on the other hand, does not wander.

Thank you for reading,
Garret

A Matter of Harmony

As you may know, the umbrella term we use for the so-called “physical substance” that is separate from mind is matter. Matter, supposedly, is what all things are made of. In fact, the belief that “I’m made of matter, and other people, objects, and animals are also made of matter,” is what’s used to explain the apparent separation between me and everything else that is “not me.”

But here’s the problem with this belief about separation (and matter): Although scientists keep trying, they’ve yet to find this physical substance called matter. Really. Go ahead and search “Does matter exist?” You’ll be amazed at what comes up.

So, then, rather than keep searching for it, perhaps (and as strange as this might sound) it's time for scientists and the rest of us to admit that matter doesn’t exist.

Perhaps, instead, we should consider viewing experience from this perspective: All things are an image of Consciousness occurring within Consciousness. Perhaps when this is realized, “not me” will permanently be replaced with “we are one.”

To illustrate, here’s a metaphor I learned from a wise teacher of the Consciousness-only model, Francis Lucille: Imagine you’re on a FaceTime call on your phone or computer with two of your friends. What you experience on the screen is three separate boxes with three separate faces. You see what is “me” and what is “not me.” You see lines of distinction. But take a closer look; even tap on the screen if you will. What are the boxes, faces, and lines of distinction actually made of?

The answer: The screen. All things are made of the screen. Or, to be more precise, all things are the screen. And the screen, of course, is a metaphor for the nature of all things: infinite Consciousness itself. Sadly, in favor of accepting separation as real or true, we’ve completely overlooked that, like a FaceTime call on your phone or computer, the separate characters you see exist in appearance only. Try again to find them. Like matter, they’re not actually there.

Brilliant scientists (physicists and neurologists, included) have researched, analyzed, and experimented. They’ve tried to substantiate the apparent separation between “me” and everything else. They’ve tried to clarify the distinction between a perceiving subject and perceived object. They’ve tried to prove duality. They’ve tried to find separate things made of matter.

All to no avail.

That’s why—among your family, community, organization, country, and world—it’s only through the mutual recognition that separation merely exists in appearance, that every “thing" is an image of Consciousness appearing within Consciousness, that peace, love, and harmony will be found.

Perhaps we are one, after all.

Garret

The Benefit of Insecurity

This week, a super-short post about our culture’s addiction to coping with insecurity. Here goes:

While you've been conditioned to believe that insecurity is bad and confidence is good, when you try to rid yourself of insecurity, what you're actually doing is fighting the most valuable intuitive sign. Insecurity means that you’re looking outward for answers. You’re falling for the ego’s ploy of connecting well-being to the objects, techniques, status, rewards, and relationships of the material world.

In other words, if and when you feel insecure—you’re meant to.

Insecurity is a reminder to turn back toward Source. To turn toward the true Self. To not further seek in the material world, but to allow the feeling to come to you. Insecurity is a sign to turn inward.

Thank you for reading, Garret

Who Knows?

Toward the end of a recent event, I was asked this pertinent question:

“If there’s one message to take from today, Garret, what would it be?”

My answer:

“To understand that your body-mind doesn’t know, it is known. To realize that you don’t have experiences, you are experienced. To ask yourself, what part of the body-mind possesses the power to perceive or observe? And then to courageously admit that this body part doesn’t exist.”

Now if, to you, my answer above seems strange. Or if you’re convinced that the personal you (a body-mind) can in fact know or experience itself and a world, then right here and now let’s search for the part of you that actually does this.

Is it your brain?

Well, I get that this is what you’ve been taught, but how can a brain be aware? Even neurologists have yet to find the neural pathways that would make a brain conscious.

How about your heart? Your eyes?

How about your elbow, ears, wrist, or foot?

You get the idea.

Perhaps it’s time to consider that a body-mind isn’t the one that knows or experiences. It’s just a belief that it is. And, again, it was this precise realization that was not only paramount for the audience at the recent event, but for me several years ago as well.

Why was it paramount for me?

Because (and read this slowly) I knew that I was the knower. Yet, since it was not my body-mind who knew—then my body-mind, Garret, could not be the true me.

In other words, it’s not Garret who knows a self (Garret) and a world. Rather, it’s some other me. A true or essential Self that I longed to uncover. And this realization set me on a path of self-exploration—the pathless path of folding inward—that becomes profounder each day.

So, I ask you:

If who you truly are is of interest to you, why not join me on this inward journey back home to peace, passion, freedom, and love?

And then maybe, just maybe, we’ll be in a position to rally the world.

Garret

A Master of Deceit

It’s essential to know that a so-called separate self or ego (a human being who deems himself or herself to be an actual separate entity and not an activity of Consciousness), will do anything to maintain its own “existence.” This includes one in a position of authority or expertise. It will claim, for example, that the separate self is:

Resilient Wise Loving

It will suggest that it owns the power to:

Think Feel Perceive

It will insist that a relationship with other separate selves, or separate objects or methods, are necessary for:

Well-being Clarity Growth

It will validate separateness through concepts such as:

Separate realities Levels of Consciousness States of mind

It will promote the following delusions as positive:

Diversity Agreeing to disagree Borders

It will tout self-defense strategies, coping methods, or distractions along the lines of:

Positive thinking Narrowing focus or visualization Everything happens for a reason

It will trick you into these types of behaviors/attitudes as a personal path to peace:

Gratitude Forgiveness Acceptance

It will aggrandize itself by taking advantage of the culturally conditioned concepts of:

Fear Desire Lack

It will insist that the objective world is a place to look for:

Passion Beauty Love

It will twist spiritual words and mantras like those listed below to daze, confuse, and maintain the illusion of separateness:

Good deeds bring blessings Listen to your soul Pray to a God

Lastly, as I said earlier, to stay relevant or necessary, the separate self or ego will do anything it can to reaffirm the belief that who you truly are is an isolated individual. It will promote:

Self-belief Confidence Personal responsibility

So, then, rather than follow the beliefs of one who deems himself or herself separate, I encourage you to go with your experience. And only your experience.

Has a separate self, separate object, separate world, separate universe, or separate God ever been found?

What do you say?

Can you can find any of those without, or outside of, YOU?

So, is separation even a thing?

From the perspective of “no separation,” is it possible to resist, seek, cope, and thus suffer?

From the perspective of “no separation,” would we not live in Peace?

From the perspective of "no separation,” is there anything to fix? Anyone to hurt?

Experience transcends belief.

Look to experience, not the beliefs—the deceit—of the separate self or ego.

Answers found there.

Garret